Editorial method
What “reviewed” means on eSIM Coupon.
The method below describes the checks the current site can support. It also names the evidence and cadence that still need formal documentation.
Four current checks
From a stored record to a public deal page.
Capture the source fields
Provider name, code, discount wording, conditions, provider URL, affiliate route, and logo are stored separately.
Check the local route
The internal Pretty Link is checked against the intended provider destination before publication.
Preserve eligibility wording
New-user, any-user, first-order, minimum-spend, and unknown conditions remain visible.
Publish limits and date
Each deal shows a review date and asks the visitor to confirm acceptance and final price at checkout.
How comparisons should be ranked
Comparable inputs come before headline percentages.
Match the trip
Use the same destination or regional coverage.
Match the allowance
Compare similar data amounts and validity periods.
Apply known eligibility
Do not apply a new-user code to a returning-customer example.
Estimate, then verify
Sort the arithmetic totals, then confirm the provider checkout.
Affiliate status does not make a coupon percentage or plan price mathematically better. A provider without a commercial relationship may still appear when a usable record exists.
What is not assessed
These fields need separate evidence.
Network quality
No independent field testing of speed, latency, congestion, or indoor coverage is represented.
Support quality
Response times and refund outcomes are not scored from the current database.
Every checkout path
Taxes, account state, app-only offers, currency, and plan exclusions can change the result.
Known exceptions
Two records show why source wording matters.
ESIMADIVCE
MoodSIM is stored with this spelling. The site does not silently “correct” a code that may match the provider’s campaign.
50
MobiMatter is stored without a percentage or currency unit. It remains an unspecified offer value.
Provider terms
When exact eligibility is absent, the record says “See provider terms” instead of assigning a customer type.
Method questions
The answers below describe current site behavior.
Does “reviewed” mean the code worked at checkout?
No. It currently means the stored code, discount wording, stated condition, and local provider route were checked. Checkout acceptance remains provider-controlled.
Does the highest percentage rank first?
Not by itself. The comparable result should use the same destination, data, validity, and customer status. A larger percentage can still produce a higher final price.
Are network quality and speed scored?
No. The current records can include provider-supplied network labels, but the site does not independently measure local speed or reliability.
How are corrections handled?
Visitors can submit the provider, code, page URL, and observed problem. The record can then be checked and corrected without silently changing what was originally stored.
Last updated Aug 28, 2026
Next step
Found a record that needs correction?
Send the exact provider, code, URL, and observed result so the right field can be checked.